Tag Archives: technology

A new experiment: iPad as my primary computer

Here we go, another adventure! I am going to use my iPad as my primary computer. Or I am going to try and figure out it can’t be done. After reading this article, and knowing two people that are considering the idea, I think it’s high time to find out how doable this is.

What I do know is doable: using my iPad for 80% of my personal computer needs. I already use it as my prinary device at home for browsing the Internet, light email, light document creation, light movie creation, consumption of anything and everything online.

The real challenge comes at my job. Working at a startup, in sales, I type a lot of emails, I use a lot of Office programs (where comparability is required) and I multitask like whoa. I edit files, send attachments, and research online. I type, type, type. For my personal life, I still use my computer for photo management stuff. For creating more detailed movies.

Now, I think I’d be kidding myself (and you) if I said I thought I could optimally perform all functions of my job on my iPad. But maybe I can do 85%… or 95%… or, who knows, 100%. I truly don’t know, because I haven’t given myself permission to try it out. Now I have. I’ll post brief and detailed updates as I encounter challenges and overcome them (or do not).

In the immortal words of Mario, here we go!



A quick reflection on iPad 2

As an iPad owner for more than two months, it really can do nearly all that most people need a computer to do. Indeed, I use my iPad in lieu of a personal computer.

An apt analogy is that when cars first came out, they were all trucks. Eventually, people realized that not everyone needed a truck, so sedans came along. iPads and tablets will not replace the laptop and desktop for everyone, but they will for many.

My experiment has been to (personally) ditch the “truck”, and it has gone very well. I find myself more focused on the iPad and less ADHD, going everyone on the Internet. Moreover, I cannot remember the last time that I went to my laptop to do something personal at home (though it has happened – we’re not yet PC free).

But the true benefit, for me, has been being able to have a device dedicated to play. In a day where my job (knowledge worker!) can be done from anywhere, my iPad is a technological refuge.

Before, whenever I took out my laptop at home, in some capacity, I was taking out my work as well. Similarly, because my laptop was used in both capacities, I would be bringing my home to work. Now, my work computer means business and my iPad means play.

Of course, there are times where one fulfills the other’s role. But lines are meant to be blurry.

iPad 2? Yes, please. Why I’m buying it and what’s missing.

In August 2010, I mused about why I was waiting for iPad 2 and created a list of  features for my perfect iPad 2.  Tomorrow, the real iPad 2 launches.  Here’s why I’m going to take the plunge and buy one — and what’s still missing.

This post takes my list from six months ago and breaks it into Winners (aka new features of iPad 2) and Losers (aka features that iPad 2 lacks).  Most importantly, it ranks how much I care about each feature based on The Bummer Scale and the Awesomeness Factor.  Meet me for a recap at the end.




1.  Retina display.
Apple's Retina Display ExplanationWhat I said then:
I like using my iPhone for browsing more than my computer simply because of how crisp it looks.  Put the Retina Display on an iPad and I’d probably never look at a normal computer screen again.

iPad 2 has the same resolution as the original iPad.  Lame.  The big “wow” is supposedly in the the form factor, which has changed to be thinner and lighter.  But as my friend Chris wrote:

Thank God the iPad 2 is 33 percent thinner and .2 pounds lighter. The thing that was keeping me from buying it was it’s bulky over sized frame and it’s exhausting hulk-rendering weight. Seriously, that thing was like a stone abacus. Thank you technology for improving my life.

Zing!  But in terms of the display remaining the same resolution, this was the biggest bummer for me.  On a “Bummer Scale” of 1-10, I give this an 8.

Bummer Scale: 8


2.  Standalone capability.
Drawing from a real Apple PatentWhat I said then: Right now the iPad is, in functionality, giant iPod/iPhone.  You have to sync it to your computer.  It can’t actually replace a computer — it needs a mothership.  Change this, and you have a laptop killer.

iPad 2 is still an iPad.  This change would have been too revolutionary for this evolutionary refresh.  They don’t need to change things too much right now — just enough to stay ahead.  I mean, Apple barely has any tablet competitors to compete against; it’s almost unfair.

But mark my words.  This will be the killer feature of iPad 3, which I’m sure will launch right when other tablets are actually getting some marketshare.  (The incessant rumor mill even suggests that iPad 3 might be launched this year.)

Bummer Scale: 5


Apple iOS icon for settings

3.  More storage.
What I said then: 64GB of flash-based memory is a lot.  But I have over 100GB of media & documents on my computer.  More please!

iPad 2 has the same storage options as iPad. This is probably less a function of Apple and more a function of flash media not being economical for a small device like this at greater than 64GB.  I’ll give Apple benefit of the doubt here – maybe iPad 3.

Bummer Scale: 5


4.  A “One more thing”.
What I said then: Pull a surprise on us, Steve.  Blow iPad 1.0 out of the water.

One More Thing

Nope.  Didn’t happen this time.  Both in that Steve didn’t use the above slide and in that iPad 2 didn’t blow the original iPad out of the water.  This was an evolutionary update.  Not a revolutionary one.  Everyone in the Apple blogosphere knew what was coming, and that’s what came.

Bummer Scale: 5


5.  Microsoft Office.MS Office
What I said then:
Work with Microsoft on this.  This would be a killer entrance into enterprise.  iWork is good, but a fully compatible MS Office in the App Store would make quite an impression on business folk.

In news that didn’t surprise anyone: This did not happen.  Given the desire of Microsoft to attempt to get in on the tablet space themselves, I’d be surprised if this ever happened.  Apple has iWork and that’s likely good enough, especially with its ability to save as an Office document.  As for me, I’ve already decided this is personal — as in I’m not going to be using my iPad for work.

Bummer Scale: 2


6.  A 16:9 aspect ratio.WidescreenWhat I said then: Maybe it was a design thing, but it would be awesome if videos took up the whole screen.

iPad 2 has the same form factor as its predecessor: It’s a design thing.  And, it only took me seven months to realize this, but it won’t change.  All the 65,000 iPad apps out there are made for this screen size.  That’s 65,000 reasons for Apple not to change the screen aspect size.  Ah, well.

Bummer Scale: 2


8.  Included Camera and SD connectors.Apple iPad Camera Connector
What I said then:
I know the design is simple and that it’s in the iPhone family.  But without including a USB port, Apple should simply make it easier – and free – to import into iPad without buying extra things!

Nope.  Sadly, we all still have to buy extra things to get adapters so you can easily import things directly into the iPad.

Bummer Scale: 2



7.  TV Tuner.
What I said then: It’d be pretty nifty to have a TV app that lets me watch terrestrial HDTV?  I would still use Hulu and Netflix for cable shows.  But I feel that the lossy nature of terrestrial television broadcast isn’t polished enough for Apple.

iPad 2, unsurprisingly, does not sport a TV Tuner.  I didn’t think this would really happen, but we were talking about my perfect iPad 2, remember?  Any TV-like capabilities will be through apps.

Bummer Scale: 1




1.  Wireless HD video output.
AirPlay for iPadWhat I said then: I don’t know how this would even be feasible, but damn it would be cool.  At the very least — and more reasonable — wired 1080p output.

BOOM.  (As Steve would say.)  Granted, you have to have an AppleTV, but with AirPlay, I can wirelessly broadcast video and, as of iOS 4.3, apps on the big screen.  Additionally, they’ve announced a wired method.   You can now mirror your iPad on the big screen through a dock connector.  Too bad this isn’t entirely free.  For AirPlay, you have to have an AppleTV ($100).  For mirroring, you have to have the HDMI Connector ($40).

As an aside: Bets on how long it takes before AppleTV is marketed as a gaming console?  Picture developers making games that broadcast the game itself to the big screen and your iPad/iPhone is a controller.

Awesome factor: 8


2.  The ability to stand it up.iPad 2 Smart Cover
What I said then:
For many uses, the iPad needs to be vertical.  I’m sure there’s a way to have a stand in the back that would be flush with the metal unless you pulled it out. (Imagine: a picture frame meets the battery removal mechanism of the unibody MacBook Pro.)

Smart Covers simply blow my metal stand idea out of the water.  Just watch this video.

Again, they are not included and cost extra ($40-$70), which dings their awesomeness.  But just the fact that iPad 2 was designed with them in mind sets the bar high for other covers/cases.

Awesome factor: 6



3. A front camera.  With FaceTime.
What I said then: You know this is coming.  It’s a given.  Apple just saved the unveiling of FaceTime for iPhone 4.

No surprise here; iPad 2 has a front camera.  FaceTime on iPad!  Which is great, and I love the idea, but I use FaceTime about twice a month.  (Also, the latest FaceTime icon reminds me of a duck.  Just saying.)

Bonus:  iPad 2 has a rear HD video camera, which is awesome, even if the stills are inexplicably 0.7 megapixels.  No, that’s not a typo.  It shoots 720p video but it takes crappier photos than my 2003 camera.  Granted, that camera was the size of a small brick, but I digress.

Awesomeness factor: 5
(Am I really going to use my iPad to video-record?)


iOS Multitasking

4.  Multi-tasking.
hat I said then: Oh, shush. I know it’s coming to iPad as soon as next month.  But I still wouldn’t be able to go back to an iOs without multi-tasking after using iPhone 4.

This happened on the original iPad, as we all knew it would.

Awesomeness factor:  5
(It’s more awesome than 5, but it’s been around for a while.)


5.  The ability to print.AirPrint for iOS
What I said then:
Seriously, this is a drawback.  How can you have a content creation device that doesn’t print?

iPads can kiiiinda print, with AirPrint, but that currently only works with select printers. As I said, I will not be using the iPad for work, and I cannot remember the last time I wanted to print something at home ever (and I don’t even own a printer).  But it’s good to know that if I really wanted to, I could buy the right printer and it would work.

Awesomeness factor:  5


7.  Some sort of built-in “My Documents” system.
What I said then:
I would love to be able to simply have an iOS-default app that stores all my documents that I would create in iWork.

DropBox for iOS

It’s been pointed out to me that this exists in other apps (free ones, even).  And iWork has it’s own built in file system.  Given how unsexy it is to organize files, I doubt we’ll ever see a default iOS app that manages documents.

Awesomeness factor:  4
(Win for the App store, though.)


6.  GPS.iOS Maps Application
What I said then: I know the 3G models have Assisted GPS.  But how about the real thing?

Um.  Yes.  Evidently assisted-GPS is the real thing.  The reason it’s called that is because cell towers assist the GPS in finding the general location of the device before locking onto it.  This is done in a few seconds, for a process that (without cellular assist) takes minutes.  I retract this one.  iPad 3G has always had it, and there are GPS apps in the app store if I was so inclined.

Awesomeness factor:  Off the charts, but for the purpose of this post, it’s zero, zilch, nada.




Awesome Factor Wins!The verdict:  Thumbs up, I’m buying it.  The Awesomeness Factor weighs in at 33, while the Bummer Scale comes in at 30. To me, what was announced  — and how iOS has evolved since last August — was more important than what wasn’t announced.

Am I buying it simply because of its Awesome Factor?  No.  I’m buying it because I’m interested in exploring the simplicity of having a work laptop and a personal tablet.  I’m betting there will be nights where I don’t touch my laptop after work.  We’ll see.

GarageBand comes to iPadIt’s also worth a quick note that my greatest surprise was the software that was announced:  GarageBand and iMovie.  They both look pretty impressive for a tablet.  And they increase what can be done with an iPad. The iPad is not yet a computer replacement, but that it does 80% of what a computer does (and some things a computer simply can’t) is more than enough for most people.

There are tons of positive reviews coming out from media outlets today.  They simply reinforce iPad 2 imminent success.  Apple has taken the device that virtually created the tablet market and made it better.  (Oh, and at the same price as the original. What?!)

Steve Jobs and his team at Apple did just enough to convince me that iPad 2 was worth the wait.  It’s the iPad, done right.  And I’ll be happily buying mine this weekend.

iPad 2 is here.

The Day I Got Rid of 74% of my “Followings”

As of Monday this week, I vehemently disliked going on my Twitter account.  Three days later, I’ve applied some mindfulness to Twitter, and actually enjoy checking my feed a few times a day.  

In the 1990s, a British anthropologist theorized that there is a limit for the number of people with whom we can have meaningful relationships. That limit is 150 people.  So why the hell was I following around 300 people on Twitter?  

Last month, I wrote “Cutting Through The Noise”, reflecting on my February 2010 Media Blackout.  My basic conclusion was that I needed to be more mindful about communication and consumption:

“That’s what my February Media Blackout revealed to me, that I have just “defaulted” to various ways of consuming without thinking about the why.”

This week, I began thinking about my journey on Twitter.  I joined right at the crest of its popularity, in May 2009, and was initially gung-ho.  I followed anyone I found remotely interesting.  Then, in the past ten months, I’ve definitely become ambivalent to Twitter.  I took a complete hiatus for three months, not posting at all from the beginning of my blackout in February to setting up autopost for my blog in May.  With a few exceptions, I haven’t tweeted much at all aside from this autoposting.  

So here we are in December, and I started to thinking about “the why” for Twitter.  Why not just delete my Twitter?  Why not remove it from my life?  I like the connections and communications that Twitter brings.  That’s why anyone is on it.  So why did I start to dislike it?  

I disliked it because I was following too many people.  The 300 people I was following as of Monday included people/accounts I didn’t know or care about, people who’s tweets didn’t add anything into my life, and people whom I felt obligated to follow.  On Tuesday, I took a knife to who I was following.  And if I’m not following you anymore, it’s okay!  I’m still accessible (just @ me).  

To do this, I applied a simple question of value:  Did seeing this person’s tweets in my timeline add any value to my life?  It was a hard question to ask sometimes, but if I wanted to honestly and mindfully use Twitter, I needed to ask it.  Interestingly, Twitter itself recommends this kind of mindfulness: 

“If you follow too many people, there’s no way you can keep up with everyone’s updates in your timeline. If you need to communicate with someone but don’t need to see their updates everyday, you don’t have to follow them. Send them an @reply when you need to; it doesn’t require following and your update will appear in the person’s replies tab, so they can reply back.”

I now follow 77 people, and each adds some sort of value.  I’m sure this number will increase, and I’ll assess as I go.  Regardless, I’d highly recommend this for anyone on the fence about Twitter.  How many followers do you have?